Skip to main content
4,573 tracked

Entities

Registers of the facilities, companies and countries on record, with the ownership chains between them.

709 of 4,257 facility records have an operational measure

4,257 facility records are individually browsable here, of which 709 have an operational measure: power, GPU or FLOP capacity, or a substantive description. The other 3,548 establish that a site exists and stop there. Which of the two a record is depends almost entirely on the catalogue it arrived in.

Two counts on this page

Two counts appear on this page and they are not the same quantity. The masthead stamps 4,573 tracked records: the full corpus across 110 countries, the figure used site-wide. The register and the plate count the 4,257 that are individually browsable; the 316 in between are rows a licensing term keeps from being served as their own record. They inform aggregates and they are not hidden. They cannot be opened, so a figure about what a reader can inspect must not count them. The same universe is plotted in space on the map, rolled up by jurisdiction on Countries, and the organisations that own and operate these sites are in the company register.

  1. Epoch AI Frontier Data Centers7064 measured91.4%
  2. Epoch AI GPU Clusters437396 measured90.6%
  3. PeeringDB facility registry1,56963 measured4.0%
  4. IM3 / PNNL data-center corpus3912 measured0.5%
  5. OpenStreetMap (tagged data centers)1,1731 measured0.1%
  6. OpenStreetMap2310 measured0.0%
  7. Microsoft Azure region documentation560 measured0.0%
  8. Oracle Cloud region documentation450 measured0.0%
  9. 43 smaller catalogues285183 measured64.2%

Coverage by catalogue. Each band is one catalogue: its length is that catalogue’s share of the largest one’s row count, and the inked run inside it is the rows with at least one operational measure.

Nothing here is schematic; both lengths are measured proportions of the counts printed beside them.

No share-of-megawatts is drawn: every megawatt-bearing row satisfies the measured predicate by construction, so a capacity share would be a tautology.

Counts cover the full individually-browsable set, 4,257 rows, read 4 September 2026.

The smallest catalogues are folded into one band whose run is hatched, because it averages catalogues of both kinds. Each named catalogue’s key opens the register below scoped to its rows.

Epoch AI Frontier Data Centers runs 91.4% measured across 70 records; OpenStreetMap runs 0.0% across 231. No single catalogue falls in between; the hatched band does, but it is the fold of 43 smaller catalogues and reads mid-scale only because it averages the two kinds. The separation exists because the two kinds of catalogue do different jobs: one is a research dataset built by measuring sites, the other an infrastructure registry built by recording that they exist.

Shown whole, most of the 4,257 rows could not answer the question a reader arrived with. The positional records are not filler: a site that exists is a real fact, and for a governance reader tracing where capacity might appear it is often the fact that matters. But it is a different fact from a megawatt figure, and a register that prints them in one undifferentiated count makes a uniformity claim its records do not support.

The register

Showing all 1,303 matching records, including the 1,010 positional ones with no capacity figure attached. Show only the 293 measured.

1,2511,300 of 1,303Page 26 of 27
FacilityCountryTypeStatusPower (MW)
TierPoint Boston - AndoverPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Charlotte - North MyersPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Tulsa-State FarmPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Kansas City - LenexaPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Oklahoma CityPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Raleigh – RTPPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint SeattlePeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix SE2/SE3 - SeattlePeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Sioux Falls - EastPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint WaterburyPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
CoreSite - Chicago (CH2)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Digital Realty CH2 - ChicagoPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Digital Realty CH3 - ChicagoPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Digital Realty DFW (4025 Midway Road)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Digital Realty DFW (2440 Marsh Lane)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix NY1 - New York, NewarkPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix MI6 - Miami, DoralPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Digital Realty EWR (100 Delawanna)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Telxius San Juan DCPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
1530 SWIFT - NOCIXPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
NOCIX Clay FacilityPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Fort Rock Data CenterPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
PhoenixNAPPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
123.NET - DC4 - 400 76th St SWPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix AT1 - AtlantaPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix LA7 - Los AngelesPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
QTS Ashburn (ASH3)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Colo Solutions Downtown OrlandoPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Cogent AtlantaPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
CoreSite - Washington,DC (DC2)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
CoreSite - Los Angeles (LA3)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix CH3 - Elk GrovePeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
QuadraNet DTLAPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Connect Des MoinesPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
T5@CincinnatiPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
T5@MinneapolisPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Polar Semiconductor Bloomington MN (200mm sensor + power chip fab)U.S. Commerce Department CHIPS for AmericaUSLogic fabOperational
Samsung Austin Semiconductor (S2 Fab)Company disclosure (press / IR)USLogic fabOperational
Samsung Taylor TX (two leading-edge logic fabs + R&D fab)NIST CHIPS R&D OfficeUSLogic fabUnder construction
SK hynix West Lafayette IN (AI memory advanced packaging)NIST CHIPS R&D OfficeUSPackagingUnder construction
SolAero Albuquerque NM (space-grade III-V semiconductors)NIST CHIPS R&D OfficeUSLogic fabOperational
TI Lehi UT (LFAB2, 300mm analog fab)NIST CHIPS R&D OfficeUSLogic fabUnder construction
TI Sherman TX (SM1 + SM2, 300mm analog fabs)NIST CHIPS R&D OfficeUSLogic fabUnder construction
TSMC Arizona Fab 21Company disclosure (press / IR)USLogic fabUnder construction
TSMC Arizona Fab 21 (Phase 1)Company disclosure (press / IR)USLogic fabOperational
TSMC Arizona Fab 21 (Phase 2)Company disclosure (press / IR)USLogic fabUnder construction
TSMC Arizona Fab 21 (Phase 3)Company disclosure (press / IR)USLogic fabUnder construction
xAI Colossus MemphisPress reportingUSAI trainingExpanding
Suffern Quarry Data CenterGridStatusUSHyperscale DCDecommissioned
Suffern Quarry Data CenterGridStatusUSHyperscale DCDecommissioned