Entities
Registers of the facilities, companies and countries on record, with the ownership chains between them.
709 of 4,257 facility records have an operational measure
4,257 facility records are individually browsable here, of which 709 have an operational measure: power, GPU or FLOP capacity, or a substantive description. The other 3,548 establish that a site exists and stop there. Which of the two a record is depends almost entirely on the catalogue it arrived in.
Two counts appear on this page and they are not the same quantity. The masthead stamps 4,573 tracked records: the full corpus across 110 countries, the figure used site-wide. The register and the plate count the 4,257 that are individually browsable; the 316 in between are rows a licensing term keeps from being served as their own record. They inform aggregates and they are not hidden. They cannot be opened, so a figure about what a reader can inspect must not count them. The same universe is plotted in space on the map, rolled up by jurisdiction on Countries, and the organisations that own and operate these sites are in the company register.
- Epoch AI Frontier Data Centers7064 measured91.4%
- Epoch AI GPU Clusters437396 measured90.6%
- PeeringDB facility registry1,56963 measured4.0%
- IM3 / PNNL data-center corpus3912 measured0.5%
- OpenStreetMap (tagged data centers)1,1731 measured0.1%
- OpenStreetMap2310 measured0.0%
- Microsoft Azure region documentation560 measured0.0%
- Oracle Cloud region documentation450 measured0.0%
- 43 smaller catalogues285183 measured64.2%
Coverage by catalogue. Each band is one catalogue: its length is that catalogue’s share of the largest one’s row count, and the inked run inside it is the rows with at least one operational measure.
Nothing here is schematic; both lengths are measured proportions of the counts printed beside them.
No share-of-megawatts is drawn: every megawatt-bearing row satisfies the measured predicate by construction, so a capacity share would be a tautology.
Counts cover the full individually-browsable set, 4,257 rows, read 4 September 2026.
The smallest catalogues are folded into one band whose run is hatched, because it averages catalogues of both kinds. Each named catalogue’s key opens the register below scoped to its rows.
Epoch AI Frontier Data Centers runs 91.4% measured across 70 records; OpenStreetMap runs 0.0% across 231. No single catalogue falls in between; the hatched band does, but it is the fold of 43 smaller catalogues and reads mid-scale only because it averages the two kinds. The separation exists because the two kinds of catalogue do different jobs: one is a research dataset built by measuring sites, the other an infrastructure registry built by recording that they exist.
Shown whole, most of the 4,257 rows could not answer the question a reader arrived with. The positional records are not filler: a site that exists is a real fact, and for a governance reader tracing where capacity might appear it is often the fact that matters. But it is a different fact from a megawatt figure, and a register that prints them in one undifferentiated count makes a uniformity claim its records do not support.
The register
Showing all 1,303 matching records, including the 1,010 positional ones with no capacity figure attached. Show only the 293 measured.
| Facility | Country | Type | Status | Power (MW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TierPoint Boston - AndoverPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint Charlotte - North MyersPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint Tulsa-State FarmPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint Kansas City - LenexaPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint Oklahoma CityPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint Raleigh – RTPPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint SeattlePeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Equinix SE2/SE3 - SeattlePeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint Sioux Falls - EastPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| TierPoint WaterburyPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| CoreSite - Chicago (CH2)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Digital Realty CH2 - ChicagoPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Digital Realty CH3 - ChicagoPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Digital Realty DFW (4025 Midway Road)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Digital Realty DFW (2440 Marsh Lane)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Equinix NY1 - New York, NewarkPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Equinix MI6 - Miami, DoralPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Digital Realty EWR (100 Delawanna)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Telxius San Juan DCPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| 1530 SWIFT - NOCIXPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| NOCIX Clay FacilityPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Fort Rock Data CenterPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| PhoenixNAPPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| 123.NET - DC4 - 400 76th St SWPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Equinix AT1 - AtlantaPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Equinix LA7 - Los AngelesPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| QTS Ashburn (ASH3)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Colo Solutions Downtown OrlandoPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Cogent AtlantaPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| CoreSite - Washington,DC (DC2)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| CoreSite - Los Angeles (LA3)PeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Equinix CH3 - Elk GrovePeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| QuadraNet DTLAPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Connect Des MoinesPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| T5@CincinnatiPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| T5@MinneapolisPeeringDB facility registry | US | Colocation | Operational | — |
| Polar Semiconductor Bloomington MN (200mm sensor + power chip fab)U.S. Commerce Department CHIPS for America | US | Logic fab | Operational | — |
| Samsung Austin Semiconductor (S2 Fab)Company disclosure (press / IR) | US | Logic fab | Operational | — |
| Samsung Taylor TX (two leading-edge logic fabs + R&D fab)NIST CHIPS R&D Office | US | Logic fab | Under construction | — |
| SK hynix West Lafayette IN (AI memory advanced packaging)NIST CHIPS R&D Office | US | Packaging | Under construction | — |
| SolAero Albuquerque NM (space-grade III-V semiconductors)NIST CHIPS R&D Office | US | Logic fab | Operational | — |
| TI Lehi UT (LFAB2, 300mm analog fab)NIST CHIPS R&D Office | US | Logic fab | Under construction | — |
| TI Sherman TX (SM1 + SM2, 300mm analog fabs)NIST CHIPS R&D Office | US | Logic fab | Under construction | — |
| TSMC Arizona Fab 21Company disclosure (press / IR) | US | Logic fab | Under construction | — |
| TSMC Arizona Fab 21 (Phase 1)Company disclosure (press / IR) | US | Logic fab | Operational | — |
| TSMC Arizona Fab 21 (Phase 2)Company disclosure (press / IR) | US | Logic fab | Under construction | — |
| TSMC Arizona Fab 21 (Phase 3)Company disclosure (press / IR) | US | Logic fab | Under construction | — |
| xAI Colossus MemphisPress reporting | US | AI training | Expanding | — |
| Suffern Quarry Data CenterGridStatus | US | Hyperscale DC | Decommissioned | — |
| Suffern Quarry Data CenterGridStatus | US | Hyperscale DC | Decommissioned | — |