Skip to main content
ScruticaOpen data and analysis for AI compute governance

Scenarios

Four stress cases over the AI-compute supply chain.

1000 km published range from Khorramabad (Imam Ali Base)2000 km published range from Khorramabad (Imam Ali Base)2500 km published range from Khorramabad (Imam Ali Base)TaiwanTSMC Fab 18 (Tainan, 8-phase Gigafab)TSMC Fab 12 Phase 4-8 (Hsinchu)TSMC Fab 20 (Baoshan, Hsinchu — N2)200 km co-location screen around AbqaiqGoogle Cloud Dammam and Ras Tanura Refinery & Terminal: assigned shared substationAramco Digital DC (Dhahran) and Abqaiq Processing Facility: assigned shared substationAramco Digital DC (Dhahran) and Ras Tanura Refinery & Terminal: assigned shared grid zoneGoogle Cloud Dammam and Abqaiq Processing Facility: assigned shared grid zoneGoogle Cloud Dammam and Jubail Industrial Complex (SATORP): assigned shared grid zoneGoogle Cloud Dammam and Jubail Desalination Plant: assigned shared grid zoneAramco Digital DC (Dhahran) and Jubail Industrial Complex (SATORP): assigned shared grid zoneAramco Digital DC (Dhahran) and Jubail Desalination Plant: assigned shared grid zoneAWS Saudi Arabia (announced region) and Khurais Oil Field: proximity onlyDataVolt Hyperscale (Riyadh) and Khurais Oil Field: proximity onlyOracle Cloud Riyadh and Khurais Oil Field: proximity onlySTC Data Center (Riyadh) and Khurais Oil Field: proximity onlyAWS Saudi Arabia (announced region)Google Cloud DammamOracle Cloud JeddahOracle Cloud RiyadhSTC Data Center (Riyadh)DataVolt Hyperscale (Riyadh)Aramco Digital DC (Dhahran)Abqaiq Processing FacilityKhurais Oil FieldRas Tanura Refinery & TerminalYanbu RefineryJubail Industrial Complex (SATORP)Shaybah Oil FieldJubail Desalination PlantNankai Trough megathrust (M8-9 class, modeled at M9.0), illustrative case radiusSouth Kanto M7-class (modeled at M7.3, representative epicenter), illustrative case radiusNankai Trough Full Rupture + South Kanto Triggered, illustrative case radius

The 14 Saudi sites sit within 2,500 km of Khorramabad, the longest published range.

Reading the four layers

Range indicates geographic reach; the chart does not estimate a strike or an outage. Missile rings use published ranges from the recorded primary position. The Saudi circle is the co-location screening radius, and models no blast; dark lines join pairs with an assigned grid connection, and pale lines pairs that are only near each other. Japanese circles are illustrative stress-case radii; affected locations are chosen separately.

Taiwan is filled in red. Its rays group reached organisations by their recorded country; line width grows with the square root of their count. Endpoints are arranged for display, including countries outside this crop. A ray describes neither a physical shipment nor a dependency path. All returned country counts remain below, including Taiwan, unknown countries and countries without a drawn endpoint.

Scenarios

Sources

Newest input August 2026.
4 sources
Data
How the figures were made

Scenario characterisation from published open-source data mapped against the facilities register and supply-chain topology; some cloud-region locations are approximate and some electricity connections are inferred from corridor proximity. 4 analyses, with input dates and recorded editorial reviews shown separately. Review cadences run 45–90 days.

Each analysis’s newest input against its last recorded review.

AnalysisNewest inputLast reviewedNext review due
Taiwan StraitJune 2026No recorded review
IRGC Missile RangeMarch 202618 Jul 20261 Sep 2026, 71 days past
Saudi GridAugust 202618 Jul 202616 Oct 2026, 26 days past
Japan EarthquakeQ2 2026No recorded review

Review triggers before the next scheduled pass. The 4 analyses have 9 watches; 4 are manual. Watches on facility records are checked automatically: a scan compares each watch’s country scope against facility records written since the analysis’s last recorded review and reports the watch as fired or clear. The manual watches cover changes no dataset here records (a strike, a change to the Saudi grid, a market-share revision); they are standing instructions to the reviewer and are never reported clear. An analysis with no recorded review has no date to compare against, so none of its watches can be evaluated until a review is recorded.

This page does not query facility observations. Automated watch verdicts are unavailable here; a page render is not an all-clear scan. Both the review ledger and complete watch register can be downloaded from Data.

Taiwan Strait. New or edited Taiwan facility records: capacity, operator, or status change at a leading-edge site (watched in Taiwan). New or edited facility records at the alternative foundries and packaging providers in the substitution assessment, whose capacity sets the estimated shortfall (watched in United States, South Korea, Japan, China). A tier-1/tier-2 publication of company-level leading-edge foundry share, which would supersede the 2021-vintage CSET country aggregate the concentration input currently uses (manual; no dataset here records this kind of change).

IRGC Missile Range. New or edited facility records across the Gulf, Israel and Turkey, the facilities compared against the published missile ranges (watched in United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Israel, Turkey). A regional strike, interception episode or air-defence deployment change that requires the incident history or defence context to be reviewed (manual; no dataset here records this kind of change).

Saudi Grid. New or edited Saudi facility records, including any new data centre and the grid zone it is assigned to (watched in Saudi Arabia). A published change to Saudi transmission topology or substation assignment. A shared named substation is the strongest evidence class in the co-location table, so a reassignment changes which pairs qualify (manual; no dataset here records this kind of change).

Japan Earthquake. New or edited Japanese or Korean facility records: memory, wafer, materials or equipment sites (watched in Japan, South Korea). A revision to published DRAM or HBM market share, the figures this analysis uses for the Korean producers’ share of world memory supply (manual; no dataset here records this kind of change).