Skip to main content
4,573 tracked

Entities

Registers of the facilities, companies and countries on record, with the ownership chains between them.

710 of 4,257 facility records carry an operational measure

4,257 facility records are individually browsable here, of which 710 carry an operational measure: power, GPU or FLOP capacity, or a substantive description. The other 3,547 establish that a site exists and stop there. Which of the two a record is depends almost entirely on the catalogue it arrived in.

Two counts on this page

Two counts appear on this page and they are not the same quantity. The masthead stamps 4,573 tracked records: the full corpus across 110 countries, the figure used site-wide. The register and the plate count the 4,257 that are individually browsable; the 316 in between are rows a licensing term keeps from being served as their own record. They inform aggregates and they are not hidden. They cannot be opened, so a figure about what a reader can inspect must not count them. The same universe is plotted in space on the map, rolled up by jurisdiction on Countries, and the organisations that own and operate these sites are in the company register.

  1. Epoch AI Frontier Data Centers7064 measured91.4%
  2. Epoch AI GPU Clusters437397 measured90.8%
  3. PeeringDB facility registry1,56963 measured4.0%
  4. IM3 / PNNL data-center corpus3912 measured0.5%
  5. OpenStreetMap (tagged data centers)1,1731 measured0.1%
  6. OpenStreetMap2310 measured0.0%
  7. Microsoft Azure region documentation560 measured0.0%
  8. Oracle Cloud region documentation450 measured0.0%
  9. 43 smaller catalogues285183 measured64.2%
Coverage by catalogue. Each band is one catalogue: its length is that catalogue’s share of the largest one’s row count, and the inked run inside it is the rows carrying at least one operational measure (power, GPU or FLOP capacity, or a substantive description). Nothing here is schematic; both lengths are measured proportions of the counts printed beside them. No share-of-megawatts is drawn: every megawatt-bearing row satisfies the measured predicate by construction, so a capacity share would be a tautology. Counts cover the full individually-browsable set, 4,257 rows, read 25 August 2026. The smallest catalogues are folded into one band whose run is hatched, because it averages catalogues of both kinds. Each named catalogue’s key opens the register below scoped to its rows.

Epoch AI Frontier Data Centers runs 91.4% measured across 70 records; OpenStreetMap runs 0.0% across 231. No single catalogue falls in between; the hatched band does, but it is the fold of 43 smaller catalogues and reads mid-scale only because it averages the two kinds. The separation exists because the two kinds of catalogue do different jobs: one is a research dataset built by measuring sites, the other an infrastructure registry built by recording that they exist. Any band’s key below opens the register scoped to that catalogue’s rows.

This is why the register opens on the measured cohort and says so; shown whole, most of the 4,257 rows could not answer the question a reader arrived with. The positional records are not filler: a site that exists is a real fact, and for a governance reader tracing where capacity might appear it is often the fact that matters. But it is a different fact from a megawatt figure, and a register that prints them in one undifferentiated count makes a uniformity claim its records do not support.

The register

Showing all 4,257 records, including the 3,547 positional ones with no capacity figure attached. Show only the 710 measured.

4,1014,150 of 4,257Page 83 of 86
FacilityCountryTypeStatusPower (MW)
Telehouse - London (Docklands West)PeeringDB facility registryGBColocationOperational
IVC ORW Saint-PetersburgPeeringDB facility registryRUColocationOperational
IP House Data CentrePeeringDB facility registryGBColocationOperational
Telxius Lima DCPeeringDB facility registryPEColocationOperational
Stellium 1PeeringDB facility registryGBColocationOperational
SRCE ZagrebPeeringDB facility registryHRColocationOperational
РТКомм-Юг (RTKomm-Yug)PeeringDB facility registryRUColocationOperational
dc2scale PAR2 (Vélizy-Villacoublay)PeeringDB facility registryFRColocationOperational
Telehouse Saint PetersburgPeeringDB facility registryRUColocationOperational
T5@ChicagoPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix HK5 - Hong KongPeeringDB facility registryHKColocationOperational
Equinix SG4 - SingaporePeeringDB facility registrySGColocationOperational
Equinix HK4 - Hong KongPeeringDB facility registryHKColocationOperational
Equinix PA6 - Paris, CondorcetPeeringDB facility registryFRColocationOperational
Medallion AbujaPeeringDB facility registryNGColocationOperational
Equinix MX1/MX2 - Mexico CityPeeringDB facility registryMXColocationOperational
Equinix MO1 - MonterreyPeeringDB facility registryMXColocationOperational
Smartdc RotterdamPeeringDB facility registryNLColocationOperational
DataBank Atlanta (ATL1)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Bolzano - Infranet AG DatacenterPeeringDB facility registryITColocationOperational
Equinix SV17 - Silicon Valley, Santa ClaraPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Teraco Johannesburg Campus, South AfricaPeeringDB facility registryZAColocationOperational
Equinix SH5 - ShanghaiPeeringDB facility registryCNColocationOperational
Level(3) Salt Lake CityPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Coloware YTZ1PeeringDB facility registryCAColocationOperational
Telxius Fortaleza DCPeeringDB facility registryBRColocationOperational
Telxius Salvador DCPeeringDB facility registryBRColocationOperational
KoloDC NL1PeeringDB facility registryNLColocationOperational
iTech Towers 2PeeringDB facility registryHKColocationOperational
TierPoint Boston - AndoverPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Charlotte - North MyersPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Tulsa-State FarmPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Kansas City - LenexaPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Oklahoma CityPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Raleigh – RTPPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint SeattlePeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix SE2/SE3 - SeattlePeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint Sioux Falls - EastPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
TierPoint WaterburyPeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational
Equinix SY5 - SydneyPeeringDB facility registryAUColocationOperational
MIX DC CALDERAPeeringDB facility registryITColocationOperational
MEVSPACE DC-1PeeringDB facility registryPLColocationOperational
Eurofiber Datacenter Amsterdam 1PeeringDB facility registryNLColocationOperational
Asnet Datacenter Sumeru BogorPeeringDB facility registryIDColocationOperational
Viettel HHTPeeringDB facility registryVNColocationOperational
euNetworks Colocation StuttgartPeeringDB facility registryDEColocationOperational
BDx SIN1 - SingaporePeeringDB facility registrySGColocationOperational
Equinix ML2 - Milan, SavonaPeeringDB facility registryITColocationOperational
Equinix ML3 - Milan, BasiglioPeeringDB facility registryITColocationOperational
CoreSite - Chicago (CH2)PeeringDB facility registryUSColocationOperational