Chile CL
Compute facilities, corporate ownership and chip access in Chile.
2 of 26 facility records have capacity figures or a description
Facility detail
7.7% with capacity data or a site description
- 2 with capacity or a description
- 24 with neither
- 16.8% globally
- 12.3% median country (39 with 20+ records)
Power on record, by what it measures
No power figure on record
- 0 MW operating
- 0 MW under construction
- 0 MW announced
- 33.1% operating worldwide, licence-withheld records excluded
Facility detail requires a positive power, GPU or FLOP figure, or a site description. Operating plant counts operational records only.
Solid reference lines show the global shares. The dashed line is the median across 39 countries with at least 20 facility records. Data retrieved October 24, 2026.
Infrastructure summary
- Facility records
- 262 have capacity data or a site description
- Operating capacity
- —No operating record carries a power figure
- Operating AI accelerators
- —No positive accelerator count is recorded.
- Entity List designations
- 2Against organisations located here — see the designations
Facilities
26 of 26 facility records: operating records first, by power, then records under construction, announced or retired. A figure the operating total does not count says why: its status, or a note beside the figure where the site operates. A dash marks an unrecorded figure.
| Facility | Type | Status | Power | Accelerators | Organisation and role |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZURE Chile Central | Hyperscale DC | Operational | — | — | Microsoft Corporation · Cloud region provider |
| GCP South America West 1 | Hyperscale DC | Operational | — | — | Google · Cloud region provider |
| OCI Chile Central (Santiago) | Hyperscale DC | Operational | — | — | · Cloud region provider |
| OCI Chile West (Valparaiso) | Hyperscale DC | Operational | — | — | · Cloud region provider |
| Data Center IFX Networks | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | IFX Networks · Site operator |
| Datacenter Conavicoop | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | — |
| Cirion | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | — |
| COLO 2 | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | Microsoft Corporation · Site operator |
| DC STO2 | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | — |
| DC STO1 | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | — |
| Data Center L7 | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | — |
| Central de Transmisiones | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | — |
| Microsoft Chile | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | Microsoft Corporation · Site operator |
| Equinix data center - ST4 | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | Equinix, Inc. · Site operator |
| Actis Data Center | Class not stated | Operational | — | — | Actis · Site operator |
| Ascenty SCL02 - Santiago | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Ascenty DataCenters e Telecom · PeeringDB listing holder |
| Equinix ST3 - Santiago | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Equinix, Inc. · PeeringDB listing holder |
| Equinix ST4 - Santiago | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Equinix, Inc. · PeeringDB listing holder |
| Cirion Santiago de Chile - SAN1 | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Cirion · PeeringDB listing holder |
| Grupo ZGH - La Florida | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Grupo ZGH SpA · Site owner |
| Equinix ST1/ | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Equinix, Inc. · PeeringDB listing holder |
| entel - CNT (torre entel) | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Entel Chile S.A. · PeeringDB listing holder |
| IFX Santiago | Colocation | Operational | — | — | PIT CHILE SPA · PeeringDB listing holder |
| GTD Chile - Moneda | Colocation | Operational | — | — | GTD Internet · PeeringDB listing holder |
| EdgeUno Datacenter Santiago Chile (SCL1) | Colocation | Operational | — | — | EdgeUno, Inc. · PeeringDB listing holder |
| Ascenty SCL01 - Santiago | Colocation | Operational | — | — | Ascenty DataCenters e Telecom · PeeringDB listing holder |
Corporate traceability
Corporate traceability of organizations linked to facilities in Chile, weighted by operating power capacity. Announced and under-construction figures are not counted here. No operating power capacity is on record for facilities in Chile, so no tier has a share of it.
- Tier 1
- —No operating figure across 10 facilities · company has an SEC identifier or a parent linked through filing, registry or supply-chain data
- Tier 2
- —No facilities · parent linked through licensed ownership data
- Tier 3
- —No facilities · parent linked through other sources
- Tier 4
- —No operating figure across 10 facilities · company identified; parent unrecorded
- Data Gap
- —No operating figure across 6 facilities · no company linked
Facilities by ownership tier
Open a facility for its ownership relationships and sources.
- Tier 4Ascenty SCL02 - SantiagoAscenty DataCenters e TelecomCompany identified; parent unrecorded—view →
- Tier 4EdgeUno Datacenter Santiago Chile (SCL1)EdgeUno, Inc.Company identified; parent unrecorded—view →
- Tier 4Ascenty SCL01 - SantiagoAscenty DataCenters e TelecomCompany identified; parent unrecorded—view →
Ownership tiers over time
Operating-capacity-weighted shares at each recorded snapshot. Dates refer to when the distribution was captured; the underlying ownership evidence can be older.
32 snapshots weighted by operating capacity, from 2026-09-23 to 2026-10-24. 144 earlier snapshots weighted every recorded power figure and are listed under Snapshot values.
All 32 record 0 MW operating, so no tier has a share to plot.
Snapshot values
Displayed MW are rounded to two decimal places. Operating capacity counts operational records only; a snapshot taken before operating weighting began lists only the figure it recorded, every status summed. Download values (JSON) for the full inputs used to calculate the shares. Consecutive snapshots showing the same figures are listed once, under their first and last dates; the download keeps every date.
2026-04-25 – 2026-05-19 · 24 snapshots
1,106.3 MW recorded, every status · 30 facilities
- Tier 1 — company has an SEC identifier or a parent linked through filing, registry or supply-chain data
- 0 MW · 11 facilities · 0.0%
- Tier 2 — parent linked through licensed ownership data
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · 0.0%
- Tier 3 — parent linked through other sources
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · 0.0%
- Tier 4 — company identified; parent unrecorded
- 1,106.3 MW · 13 facilities · 100.0%
- Data Gap — no company linked
- 0 MW · 6 facilities · 0.0%
2026-05-20 – 2026-06-02 · 14 snapshots
1,306.3 MW recorded, every status · 31 facilities
- Tier 1 — company has an SEC identifier or a parent linked through filing, registry or supply-chain data
- 0 MW · 11 facilities · 0.0%
- Tier 2 — parent linked through licensed ownership data
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · 0.0%
- Tier 3 — parent linked through other sources
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · 0.0%
- Tier 4 — company identified; parent unrecorded
- 1,306.3 MW · 14 facilities · 100.0%
- Data Gap — no company linked
- 0 MW · 6 facilities · 0.0%
2026-06-03 – 2026-09-22 · 106 snapshots
0 MW recorded, every status · 26 facilities
- Tier 1 — company has an SEC identifier or a parent linked through filing, registry or supply-chain data
- 0 MW · 10 facilities · —
- Tier 2 — parent linked through licensed ownership data
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · —
- Tier 3 — parent linked through other sources
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · —
- Tier 4 — company identified; parent unrecorded
- 0 MW · 10 facilities · —
- Data Gap — no company linked
- 0 MW · 6 facilities · —
2026-09-23 – 2026-10-24 · 32 snapshots
0 MW operating · 26 facilities
- Tier 1 — company has an SEC identifier or a parent linked through filing, registry or supply-chain data
- 0 MW · 10 facilities · —
- Tier 2 — parent linked through licensed ownership data
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · —
- Tier 3 — parent linked through other sources
- 0 MW · 0 facilities · —
- Tier 4 — company identified; parent unrecorded
- 0 MW · 10 facilities · —
- Data Gap — no company linked
- 0 MW · 6 facilities · —
Compare countries by capacity, ownership and programme funding
Capacity over time
No facility operating in Chile today has a capacity timeline; records not yet operating, campus build-out figures and earlier phases of operating clusters are not drawn here.