NIO Datacenter

This site’s record, built from what each source attests and blank where none does.

TypeHyperscale DCStatusOperationalWhereGoa, INIndexed fromOpenStreetMap

No organisation is recorded as holding this site, running it, or owning the hardware inside it

Control of a site decomposes into legs the record keeps apart — who holds it, who runs it, whose hardware is inside it — and they disagree often enough that collapsing them into one owner line is how a record starts being wrong. Everything below is drawn from what this row and the organisations above it actually carry; blanks are rendered as blanks, with what is known about why.

0/3control legs recorded0 recorded parties0 constraints · no recorded organisation to walk from

This record enters the platform from OpenStreetMap.

Control

No organisation is recorded in any of the three control legs for this site. That is a statement about this row, not about the place: the columns below are drawn empty rather than omitted so the reader can see which questions were asked and came back with nothing.

Plate I. Who holds this site, by legscrutica.com · compiled Aug 23, 2026

not recorded

Title

Which organisation holds the site?

not recorded

Operation

Which organisation runs it?

not recorded

AI hardware · per catalog

Which organisation owns the AI hardware inside it?

NIO Datacenterthe site — everything above it is an organisation, not a place

Plate I. One column per control leg. A solid, filled cell is an organisation recorded in that leg for this site; open cells above it are hops of the ownership walk; a dashed empty column is a leg with nothing recorded, drawn rather than omitted so the reader can see the question was asked. No leg carries a recorded organisation for this site, so no column is filled and no chain was walked. The legs are kept apart because the sources keep them apart: the catalog field naming an AI-hardware owner states in its own definition that the organisation it names is not necessarily the owner or operator of the facility. Nothing here is inferred from a neighbouring leg.

Reach

No organisation is recorded in any control leg for this site, so there is no ownership chain to walk. The reach analysis was not attempted for this record — nothing is claimed either way about designations, sovereign linkages or jurisdictions above it, because there is no recorded “above” to ask about.

Measurement

What the record holds as figures, with the estimate flag on the number rather than in a footnote. A derived figure and a measured one are indistinguishable downstream once the label is separated from the value.

Reading. What the record measuresscrutica.com · compiled Aug 23, 2026

not recorded

Power capacity

No power figure is recorded for this site.

not recorded

IT load

The share of power reaching compute is not recorded separately.

not recorded

Accelerators

No hardware inventory is recorded for this site.

Observation

A blank on this record can mean two very different things, and until they are separated they render identically. The plate below separates them: a field the source that produced this row has never reported for any record, and a field it reports routinely and did not report here.

What this record can say

This record was contributed by OpenStreetMap, which accounts for 231 of the 4,257 facilities tracked. Each track below is that source’s measured rate for the field — how often it reports the field at all — set beside what this record holds.

Power capacity0%Out of reachOutside this source's reach — no record of the 231 it contributes carries this field. Its absence here says nothing about the site.

Compute capacity0%Out of reachOutside this source's reach — no record of the 231 it contributes carries this field. Its absence here says nothing about the site.

Grid position3%AbsentAbsent here. OpenStreetMap reports it for 3% of its 231 records, which is too uneven to read either way.

Owning organisation79%GapAbsent here, though OpenStreetMap reports it for 79% of its 231 records. A gap in this record.

Coordinates100%HeldOn this record.

Site description0%Out of reachOutside this source's reach — no record of the 231 it contributes carries this field. Its absence here says nothing about the site.

1 of 6 fields held · 3 outside this source’s reach · 1 genuine gap · 1 unresolved

The observation. Each track is the share of OpenStreetMap’s 231 records that carry the field, measured over the corpus as of 2026-08-14 — not a statement about what the source publishes elsewhere, only about what reached this catalogue. The distinction the plate exists to draw is between a field this source has never reported, where an absence here carries no information about the site, and one it reports routinely, where an absence is a real gap in this record. Both render as an empty panel today. Nothing here is estimated: a field this record does not hold is drawn as not held, never as a projected value, and no mark is placed on the rate axis to stand for this record — it holds a field or it does not. Rates between zero and 60% are printed and left unclaimed; sources contributing fewer than 30 records are not characterised at all.

Working detail — the legs, the walk, and the blanks

1 · Why three legs and not one owner

Title, operation and AI-hardware ownership are three columns in the substrate and three different questions. They were separated because the field naming a hardware owner carries a published definition disclaiming the other two, and a page that renders them as one Owner: line reproduces the conflation in the presentation layer, where no migration can reach it.

A leg is never filled from a neighbouring leg. If title is unrecorded and operation is not, this record says exactly that.

2 · What the walk is

From each organisation recorded on this site, the ownership graph is walked upward through documented edges. Legs naming the same organisation share one walk. Each hop carries the source class of the edge that reached it, and a walk that reaches no documented ancestor is recorded as terminating rather than as a one-entity chain.

Constraints are attached to hops, never to the facility. The hop number is reported with every finding because a designation on the direct operator and one on a great-grandparent are different facts.

3 · How blanks are recorded

An empty leg draws an empty column rather than disappearing, so the reader can see the question was asked. A constraint whose attachment point could not be placed on the walk is listed as unplaced and is never drawn at the site’s own position, which would overstate its proximity.

The observation plate above separates a field outside a source’s reach from a genuine gap, using that source’s measured rate across all of its records.

4 · What is not published

Some ownership edges and sovereign-capital linkages here were established with reference to subscription corporate-data sources that cannot be republished. Where that applies, what renders is the relationship class and the public primary that establishes it; no subscription-sourced record, identifier or value is served by this site.

Other sites are in the facilities directory, and the organisations above this one have records of their own.

Reading the record…