Skip to main content

Entities

Facilities, companies, and countries — the who and where of compute — each with its full filter, sort, export, and provenance toolkit, plus the Investigator to resolve any identifier into its documented ownership chain. The map plots the same universe in space.

Brief

How the tracked compute universe splits by export-control access, which countries carry the most capacity, and where the ownership record still goes dark — the finding, the charts, the caveats, generated from the same substrate the Overview renders.

Countries · tracked compute universeaccess as of 2026-07-17

Of 62.4 GW of tracked compute capacity across 34 countries, 95% sits in countries with full or allied access to frontier hardware.

Capacity is a facility-power rollup (an estimate class — it mixes measured and estimated facility rows). Access classification is rule-derived from the export-control regimes. Countries with facilities but no classification are shown separately below.

Tracked capacity by export-control access

Full
45.1 GW · 72%
Allied
14.5 GW · 23%
Restricted
2.0 GW · 3%
Heavily restricted
632 MW · 1%
Embargoed
6 MW · 0%
Not classified
188 MW · 0%

Highest tracked capacity

United States
44.6 GW · 72%
United Arab Emirates
10.2 GW · 16%
France
2.0 GW · 3%
Saudi Arabia
2.0 GW · 3%
India
1.5 GW · 2%
China
632 MW · 1%
Malaysia
387 MW · 1%
United Kingdom
202 MW · 0%

Where the ownership record stands

Across the tracked universe, 48% of capacity traces to a public-filing beneficial owner; a further 18% sits in facilities Scrutica has not yet investigated — a data gap, distinct from an owner who is named but whose chain goes opaque.

The per-country figures — and every column behind this summary — are in the Overview table; the editorial compute-stack assessment is in the Matrix. Capacity totals are estimate-bearing; access classifications track the export-control rules and are reviewed on each major rule change.