Scrutica
GPUs
Supply Chain
Not yet available
Power capacity, hardware inventory, upstream suppliers, and downstream customers for the row owned by EuroHPC JU; any BIS Entity List exposure is walked through the canonical org graph rather than asserted at the facility row.
Capacity, ownership chain, and supply-chain position for Mimer AI Factory supercomputer, including any export-control exposure that surfaces when the BIS Entity List touches a node above the facility in the chain.
As of 2026-07-18
Operator (or owner of record) per the Scrutica facility row.
Description
AI-optimised supercomputer for the Mimer AI Factory (AIF), Sweden's EuroHPC AI Factory. EuroHPC JU procurement contract signed with Bull (formerly Eviden) on 2026-04-21; system to be hosted and operated by the National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS) at Linköping University. Liquid-cooled BullSequana XH3500 architecture: 100 nodes equipped with NVIDIA GB200 for a total of 400 GPUs, IBM ESS6000 storage connected via S3 gateway servers, 400 Gbit/s Ethernet interconnect using Nokia 7220 switches; software stack based on OpenShift for Kubernetes, Bull SMC, IBM GKLM, and BullSequana Pro AI (operator-stated, 'proposed'). Total budget EUR 29,760,000 for acquisition, delivery, installation and maintenance, co-funded 50% EuroHPC JU (Digital Europe Programme) / 50% Swedish Research Council; NAISS and EuroHPC JU will each control and allocate half of the system's resources. Installation starts in 2026 ('installed at NAISS in Linköping later in 2026' per NAISS). The Mimer AIF initiative itself launched April 2025 and is hosted by NAISS in partnership with the Research Institutes of Sweden (RISE).
Timeline
Announced
Apr 21, 2026
Notes
STAGED — NOT YET INGESTED (Task #40 staging pass, 2026-07-18). PER-FIELD SOURCE ATTRIBUTION: contract signature + date, vendor (Bull), Linköping siting, NAISS-at-Linköping-University operator role, EUR 29,760,000 total + 50/50 EuroHPC JU (DEP) / Swedish Research Council split, resource-allocation split, 'installation of the system will start in 2026', and the NAISS-RISE partnership sentence are all stated in the EuroHPC JU contract-signing press release at source_url (tier 1, fetched 2026-07-18). The hardware block (BullSequana XH3500, 100 nodes with GB200, total_gpu_count 400, IBM ESS6000, Nokia 7220 400G Ethernet, software stack, 'around EUR30 million' rounded contract value, 'installed at NAISS in Linköping later in 2026') is NOT in the JU release — it is stated on the operator's own news page, https://www.naiss.se/news/2026/04/bull-to-deliver-ai-optimised-supercomputer-for-mimer-ai-factory/ (tier 1, operator disclosure, April 2026, fetched 2026-07-18): 'Bull Sequana XH3500, 100 nodes equipped with GB200 for a total of 400 GPUs.' Both sources primary; JU figure EUR 29,760,000 is the precise contract value (NAISS rounds to ~EUR 30M — consistent). CORRECTION vs 2026-07-17 scope doc: that doc stated MIMER chip type/GPU count/node count were 'not disclosed anywhere' — superseded; the NAISS operator page carries the full hardware block and the 07-17 research pass missed it. power_capacity_mw: NOT disclosed by any source found — null. expected_operational_date: null — JU release gives only 'installation... will start in 2026' and NAISS 'installed... later in 2026'; installation-start is not an operational date and the year-precision range would be false precision (same rule as fac-hammerhai-stuttgart). status 'announced' not 'under_construction': as of 2026-07-18 no source confirms installation has begun. DEDUP: DISTINCT from fac-eurohpc-arrhenius (also NAISS/Linköping) — Arrhenius is the EuroHPC mid-range general-purpose system (NVIDIA Grace Hopper architecture, contract 2025-07-10); Mimer AIF is the separate AI-Factory system (Bull XH3500/GB200, contract 2026-04-21). Two distinct EuroHPC systems at the same hosting entity — do not conflate or sum. Operator FK: canonical org-naiss (already operator of fac-eurohpc-arrhenius); the separate org-empanelled-naiss stub is the sovereign_programs empanelment-namespace row — flagged for canonical-map dedup, not used here. [sovereign-staged-2026-07-18]
Chain terminates at a government entity (EuroHPC JU); sovereign authority is the documented terminus.
Sweden (SE)
Inspektionen för strategiska produkter (ISP) administers EU dual-use controls.
Regimes: Wassenaar Arrangement; EU Dual-Use Regulation 2021/821; EU Delegated Regulation 2025/2189
Established via: EuroHPC JU
No flags found across the chain (BIS Entity List, designation-cascade closures, or compute-threshold reporting obligations) as of 2026-07-18. Cascade closures evaluated: 0.
No ownership-change events documented in the available data for any entity in this chain over the last 5 years. Events draw from a licensed corporate-ownership database’s deal records (M&A, buyout, divestiture, asset sale, JV formation); coverage is strongest for private US/EU transactions and partial for state-owned-enterprise restructurings or non-Western private deals. Subsequent ingestion runs may add events here.
No documented sovereign or state-linked LP investment touches any entity in this chain. The licensed fund/LP database’s LP-disclosure rate is partial; absence of evidence here is not evidence of absence.
The walk for Mimer AI Factory supercomputerstarts at the operator org id (or owner org id when no operator is recorded) and climbs upward through the unified affiliate graph, normalized to trace child-to-parent relationships. At each hop, the highest-authority parent edge wins (priority ordering: SEC EDGAR / 10-K / LEI registry > licensed corporate-ownership database > licensed supply-chain database > BIS / Federal Register > licensed affiliate graph). Confidence and recency break ties.
The walk terminates on (a) a node with a public-filing-grade ancestor edge — a SEC filer, an LEI-registered listed entity, or a 10-K-disclosed parent — (b) a government entity, (c) a 10-hop limit, or (d) a detected cycle. When termination is not at a public filer or government, the panel labels the chain's end-state as opaque beyond that point. Opacity is reported, never implied.
Per-source confidence (licensed corporate-ownership database): HIGH for Parent / Subsidiary edges; MEDIUM for JV and AFFILIATE edges. Known limitations: (1) shell companies with undisclosed principals terminate the public-record walk; (2) recent transactions reach the panel after the database's weekly refresh; (3) cross-jurisdiction private holding structures may carry intermediate hops that are not in any ingested source. Each row carries an edge-level as of date so freshness is auditable per hop.
Two further caveats are inherent to how the walker and the underlying data compose. The walker selects a single highest-authority parent per hop, so JV or multi-parent ownership structures collapse to one displayed path; alternate parents exist in the ingested sources but are not surfaced on this card. And some licensed-database edges encode parent-of relations against entity-resolved stub IDs whose display name reflects a sub-entity (a business unit, an acquired-then-renamed line) rather than the canonical parent — when a chain reads structurally surprising, the per-row source citation is the authoritative reference, not the chain's narrative shape.
Computed at: 2026-07-18. Walk depth observed: 1 hop. Sources combined: Scrutica facility record + licensed corporate-ownership database + SEC CIK cross-reference + LEI registry + (where applicable) licensed supply-chain database + Federal Register designation closures. The licensed databases are held under subscription and not redistributed; per-hop labels name no vendor.
Daedalus / Pharos AI Factory (EuroHPC)
Lavrio, GR