Governance

Regulatory regime modeling: chip classification trees, multi-regime threshold analysis, sovereign program gap between announced and deployed, allied coordination gaps quantified by centrality.

Who controls access to AI compute, and how? Export control regimes, sovereign AI investments, regulatory thresholds, and where allied coordination breaks down.

34sovereign AI programs

137BIS-matched entities

Export Controls contains 11 chip classification profiles and 3 regulatory regimes (US BIS, EU AI Act, Wassenaar). FLOP Compliance implements multi-regime threshold checking against facility-level capacity estimates.

Export Controls covers the regulatory landscape — chip classifications, designation cascades, the regimes that bind access. Sovereign AI tracks which countries committed what, and how much of the announced money actually reached deployment. National Profiles synthesize both at country level.

Export ControlsStart here

Chip-level access constraints by destination, country access profiles, and the regulatory landscape across US, Netherlands/EU, and Japan.

Sovereign AI

National AI compute commitments across 30+ countries. Government-only investment, reality ratios, and how far execution trails announcements.34 programs tracked

National Profiles

National compute capacity across 7 supply chain layers (materials → cloud) with export control constraint overlay.