Scrutica
Supply Chain
Not yet available
Power capacity, hardware inventory, upstream suppliers, and downstream customers for the row owned by Airtrunk; any BIS Entity List exposure is walked through the canonical org graph rather than asserted at the facility row.
Capacity, ownership chain, and supply-chain position for AirTrunk SGP2 (Loyang), including any export-control exposure that surfaces when the BIS Entity List touches a node above the facility in the chain.
As of 2026-07-06
Operator (or owner of record) per the Scrutica facility row.
Ownership chain not yet documented in the available data (licensed corporate-ownership database, licensed supply-chain database, SEC filings, LEI registry; as of 2026-07-06). The chain may extend further once additional ingestion runs complete; absence here reflects coverage at this snapshot, not a documented apex.
Description
AirTrunk SGP2 hyperscale colocation facility at Loyang, Singapore. AirTrunk-led consortium with ByteDance was one of 4 awardees of Singapore IMDA's pilot Data Centre — Call for Application (DC-CFA) on 2023-07-14, sharing in a total ~80 MW new-capacity allocation across all 4 awardees (the other 3: Equinix, GDS, Microsoft per Techerati / Mingtiandi). Individual per-awardee MW split NOT publicly disclosed. Targeting 2026 operational completion per Baxtel + Mingtiandi tracking. AirTrunk operates SGP1 separately (also in Singapore). ByteDance is recorded as TENANT via separate facility_relationships row; precise consortium role (equity co-developer vs anchor-tenant offtake commitment) NOT disclosed in any fetched primary source — flag at row notes.
Timeline
Announced
Jul 14, 2023
Expected Operational
Dec 31, 2026
Notes
authority_tier=1: IMDA Singapore primary press release 2023-07-14 announcing 4 DC-CFA awardees including AirTrunk-ByteDance consortium with ~80 MW total allocation across all 4 awardees. expected_operational_date set to 2026-12-31 placeholder per "targeting 2026" public framing (no specific quarter / month disclosed in primary source). Per-awardee MW NOT disclosed — power_capacity_mw NULL per anti-fabrication discipline. Lat/lng NULL — Loyang district siting only. Owner=operator=AirTrunk; ByteDance routed via separate facility_relationships TENANT row below with role_unconfirmed flag in that row's notes. DayOne Singapore SG1 (groundbreaking July 2025, Phase 1 targeting 2026) is a SEPARATE development; no ByteDance tenancy confirmed there per research.
Other Airtrunk Facilities
No jurisdictions documented for this chain in the available data — at least one ancestor must carry an HQ country in the canonical organization record for jurisdictional exposure to compute. This section will populate automatically as additional ingestion adds HQ countries to the chain.
No flags found across the chain (BIS Entity List, designation-cascade closures, or compute-threshold reporting obligations) as of 2026-07-06. Cascade closures evaluated: 0.
No ownership-change events documented in the available data for any entity in this chain over the last 5 years. Events draw from a licensed corporate-ownership database’s deal records (M&A, buyout, divestiture, asset sale, JV formation); coverage is strongest for private US/EU transactions and partial for state-owned-enterprise restructurings or non-Western private deals. Subsequent ingestion runs may add events here.
No documented sovereign or state-linked LP investment touches any entity in this chain. The licensed fund/LP database’s LP-disclosure rate is partial; absence of evidence here is not evidence of absence.
The walk for AirTrunk SGP2 (Loyang)starts at the operator org id (or owner org id when no operator is recorded) and climbs upward through the unified affiliate graph, normalized to trace child-to-parent relationships. At each hop, the highest-authority parent edge wins (priority ordering: SEC EDGAR / 10-K / LEI registry > licensed corporate-ownership database > licensed supply-chain database > BIS / Federal Register > licensed affiliate graph). Confidence and recency break ties.
The walk terminates on (a) a node with a public-filing-grade ancestor edge — a SEC filer, an LEI-registered listed entity, or a 10-K-disclosed parent — (b) a government entity, (c) a 10-hop limit, or (d) a detected cycle. When termination is not at a public filer or government, the panel labels the chain's end-state as opaque beyond that point. Opacity is reported, never implied.
Per-source confidence (licensed corporate-ownership database): HIGH for Parent / Subsidiary edges; MEDIUM for JV and AFFILIATE edges. Known limitations: (1) shell companies with undisclosed principals terminate the public-record walk; (2) recent transactions reach the panel after the database's weekly refresh; (3) cross-jurisdiction private holding structures may carry intermediate hops that are not in any ingested source. Each row carries an edge-level as of date so freshness is auditable per hop.
Two further caveats are inherent to how the walker and the underlying data compose. The walker selects a single highest-authority parent per hop, so JV or multi-parent ownership structures collapse to one displayed path; alternate parents exist in the ingested sources but are not surfaced on this card. And some licensed-database edges encode parent-of relations against entity-resolved stub IDs whose display name reflects a sub-entity (a business unit, an acquired-then-renamed line) rather than the canonical parent — when a chain reads structurally surprising, the per-row source citation is the authoritative reference, not the chain's narrative shape.
Computed at: 2026-07-06. Walk depth observed: 1 hop. Sources combined: Scrutica facility record + licensed corporate-ownership database + SEC CIK cross-reference + LEI registry + (where applicable) licensed supply-chain database + Federal Register designation closures. The licensed databases are held under subscription and not redistributed; per-hop labels name no vendor.
1-Net
Singapore, SG