Scrutica
Capacity, hardware inventory, ownership chain, and supply-chain position for Intel Fab 52 Magdeburg. Any export-control exposure is walked through the canonical organization graph — surfacing when the BIS Entity List touches a node above the facility in the chain — rather than asserted at the facility row.
As of 2026-07-27
Operator (or owner of record) per the Scrutica facility row.
1 record
Every organization on record at Intel Fab 52 Magdeburg, with the role it plays and the source for that specific claim. A party marked inferred is recorded as a reading of the cited source rather than something the source states outright.
Source: Company Press Releases · Tier 2
Intel, the documented owner of Intel Fab 52 Magdeburg, sits as a seed node in 1 pre-built cascade scenario. Severity and decay are scenario parameters (editorial), not measured values: severity is the scenario's seed-impact value (per-node override where one is defined); decay reflects the curator's substitutability assessment for the disrupted role. Run any scenario to walk the propagation through the full supply-chain graph.
Domestic substitution (Huawei Ascend, SMIC at advanced nodes, domestic EDA pilots) dampens each upstream hop as US revenue loss propagates back through the supply chain.
Description
Cancelled. Intel’s second-quarter 2025 earnings release, dated 2025-07-24, states that Intel “will no longer move forward with planned projects in Germany and Poland” — ending the €30 billion Magdeburg megafab announced in March 2022. Germany had pledged federal funding of up to €9.9 billion under a declaration of intent signed 2023-06-23, which the Federal Government itself described as subject to European Commission approval under state-aid law. Intel first paused the project by “approximately two years” in September 2024; the July 2025 statement ended it.
Timeline
Announced
Mar 15, 2022
Notes
Corrected 2026-07-26. This record previously described the project as paused and stated that a €9.9 billion EU Chips Act subsidy had been approved; both are superseded. CANCELLATION — Intel’s Q2 2025 earnings release (2025-07-24, issuer disclosure, authority tier 1), verbatim: “Intel will no longer move forward with planned projects in Germany and Poland.” https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1745/intel-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial-results SUBSIDY STATUS — the German Federal Government’s own statement on the 2023-06-23 declaration of intent gives federal funding of “up to 9.9 billion euros” and adds “This funding is subject to approval by the European Commission under state aid legislation” (government primary, authority tier 1): pledged subject to approval, which is not the same as approved. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/news/intel-investment-decision-2199006 Scrutica asserts nothing about whether that approval or any disbursement followed — no primary source was located either way. PRIOR STATE — paused 2024-09-16 per Intel’s foundry update; the memo, as quoted contemporaneously, reads “We will pause our projects in Poland and Germany by approximately two years based on anticipated market demand.” https://newsroom.intel.com/corporate/foundry-momentum-progress-plan
Other Intel Facilities
Chain walk halted at a cyclic affiliate relation; further ancestors require manual structural review.
United States (US)
Operates the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the BIS Entity List under 15 CFR 730–774; deemed-export rules extend reach to foreign nationals on US soil.
Regimes: Wassenaar Arrangement; US EAR (BIS Entity List authority)
Established via: Intel
No flags found across the chain (BIS Entity List, designation-cascade closures, or compute-threshold reporting obligations) as of 2026-07-27. Cascade closures evaluated: 0.
No ownership-change events documented in the available data for any entity in this chain over the last 5 years. Events draw from a licensed corporate-ownership database’s deal records (M&A, buyout, divestiture, asset sale, JV formation); coverage is strongest for private US/EU transactions and partial for state-owned-enterprise restructurings or non-Western private deals. Subsequent ingestion runs may add events here.
Commitments dated 12+ years ago are framed in the past tense: closed-end private-market funds are typically structured on a ~10-year term plus extensions, and the source records the commitment event, not whether a position remains today.
Mubadala Investment Company
Mubadala is associated with United Arab Emirates’s UAE: Stargate UAE / G42 / Core42 / TII Sovereign AI + Microsoft Cumulative + Abu Dhabi Digital Strategy. See actor profile →
Touches Intel (chain hop 1) via a private-market fund. Commitment dollar value not disclosed (2019-12-31).
Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund
PIF is associated with Saudi Arabia’s Saudi Arabia: HUMAIN / Project Transcendence. See actor profile →
Touches Intel (chain hop 1) via a private-market fund. Commitment dollar value not disclosed (2019-12-31).
Qatar Investment Authority
QIA is a QA-domiciled sovereign vehicle (no Scrutica-tracked sovereign AI program for this country yet). See actor profile →
Touches Intel (chain hop 1) via a private-market fund. Fund commitment disclosed (amount held under license) (2018-05-10).
GIC Private· 2004 commitment
GIC is associated with Singapore’s Singapore: National AI Strategy 2.0 / AISG / NSCC Sovereign Compute. See actor profile →
Committed capital in 2004 to a private-market fund whose documented portfolio included Intel (chain hop 1). Commitment dollar value not disclosed (2004-09-07). The source records the commitment event, not whether a position remains.
The walk for Intel Fab 52 Magdeburgstarts at the operator org id (or owner org id when no operator is recorded) and climbs upward through the unified affiliate graph, normalized to trace child-to-parent relationships. At each hop, the highest-authority parent edge wins (priority ordering: SEC EDGAR / 10-K / LEI registry > licensed corporate-ownership database > licensed supply-chain database > BIS / Federal Register > licensed affiliate graph). Confidence and recency break ties.
The walk terminates on (a) a node with a public-filing-grade ancestor edge — a SEC filer, an LEI-registered listed entity, or a 10-K-disclosed parent — (b) a government entity, (c) a 10-hop limit, or (d) a detected cycle. When termination is not at a public filer or government, the panel labels the chain's end-state as opaque beyond that point. Opacity is reported, never implied.
Per-source confidence (licensed corporate-ownership database): HIGH for Parent / Subsidiary edges; MEDIUM for JV and AFFILIATE edges. Known limitations: (1) shell companies with undisclosed principals terminate the public-record walk; (2) recent transactions reach the panel after the database's weekly refresh; (3) cross-jurisdiction private holding structures may carry intermediate hops that are not in any ingested source. Each row carries an edge-level as of date so freshness is auditable per hop.
Two further caveats are inherent to how the walker and the underlying data compose. The walker selects a single highest-authority parent per hop, so JV or multi-parent ownership structures collapse to one displayed path; alternate parents exist in the ingested sources but are not surfaced on this card. And some licensed-database edges encode parent-of relations against entity-resolved stub IDs whose display name reflects a sub-entity (a business unit, an acquired-then-renamed line) rather than the canonical parent — when a chain reads structurally surprising, the per-row source citation is the authoritative reference, not the chain's narrative shape.
Computed at: 2026-07-27. Walk depth observed: 1 hop. Sources combined: Scrutica facility record + licensed corporate-ownership database + SEC CIK cross-reference + LEI registry + (where applicable) licensed supply-chain database + Federal Register designation closures. The licensed databases are held under subscription and not redistributed; per-hop labels name no vendor.