Scrutica
Where Microsoft Corporation sits in the compute supply chain — geographic revenue split, segment mix, capex / FCF / buyback history, and industry placement — sourced from licensed-database extracts and SEC EDGAR, joined to the supply-chain graph through the industry classification.
| Year | Capex | Op. CF | FCF | Buybacks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | ||||
| FY2024 | ||||
| FY2023 | ||||
| FY2022 | ||||
| FY2021 |
Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row — SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy — shared market sensitivity, not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline.
The substrates above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Microsoft Corporation's own numbers into the tool that acts on them.
471 upstream · 267 downstream — the interactive graph opens with Microsoft Corporation selected. The cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment.
The facility table filtered to exactly these records — class, status, and power per row, exportable with full provenance columns.
Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country.
Side-by-side facilities, GPU inventory, power, revenue, capex, and market cap.