Scrutica
Supply Chain
Not yet available
Facility-level telemetry including power capacity, hardware deployments, supplier relationships, and downstream dependencies. Linked to Vantage Data Centers with cross-referenced BIS Entity List matches.
Detailed intelligence on Vantage Data Centers Port Washington. Tracks operational capacity, ownership structure, and the facility's strategic position within the global AI supply chain, including relevant export control restrictions.
As of 2026-04-27
Direct operator or owner of this facility per the Scrutica facility record.
Timeline
Announced
Oct 30, 2025
Notes
NLP-extracted from CIQ. Confidence: high. Headline: Vantage Data Centers and Wisconsin Building Trades Council Partner to Build Port Washington Data Center Development. Operator filter: allowlisted.
Energy Profile
Grid Carbon
~413.41 gCO2/kWhCarbon Intensity
~413.41 kg CO2/MWhBalancing Authority
MISONERC Region
RFCeGRID Subregion
RFCWOther Vantage Data Centers Facilities
Parent / controlling entity, documented through a public filing or LEI registry.
Source: SEC EDGAR · Confidence HIGH · As of 2022-02-28
Chain terminates at a publicly-listed entity (DigitalBridge Group). Subsequent ownership is observable via SEC filings or the equivalent national registry.
United States (US)
Operates the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and the BIS Entity List under 15 CFR 730–774; deemed-export rules extend reach to foreign nationals on US soil.
Regimes: Wassenaar Arrangement; US EAR (BIS Entity List authority)
Established via: Vantage Data Centers, DigitalBridge Group
No flags found across the chain (BIS Entity List, designation-cascade closures, or compute-threshold reporting obligations) as of 2026-04-27. Cascade closures evaluated: 0.
No ownership-change events documented in Scrutica’s available substrate for any entity in this chain over the last 5 years. Events draw from PitchBook deal records (M&A, buyout, divestiture, asset sale, JV formation); PitchBook coverage is strongest for private US/EU transactions and partial for state-owned-enterprise restructurings or non-Western private deals. Subsequent ingestion runs may add events here.
Kuwait Investment Authority
KIA is a KW-domiciled sovereign vehicle (no Scrutica-tracked sovereign AI program for this country yet). See actor profile →
Touches DigitalBridge Group (chain hop 2) via fund Constellation Generation IV. Commitment dollar value not disclosed (2022-11-17).
Mubadala Investment Company
Mubadala is associated with United Arab Emirates’s UAE: Stargate UAE / G42 / Core42 / TII Sovereign AI. See actor profile →
Touches DigitalBridge Group (chain hop 2) via fund SoftBank Vision Fund. Disclosed commitment $15,000M (2018-05-10).
Qatar Investment Authority
QIA is a QA-domiciled sovereign vehicle (no Scrutica-tracked sovereign AI program for this country yet). See actor profile →
Touches DigitalBridge Group (chain hop 2) via fund SoftBank Vision Fund. Disclosed commitment $100M (2018-05-10).
Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund
PIF is associated with Saudi Arabia’s Saudi Arabia: HUMAIN / Project Transcendence. See actor profile →
Touches DigitalBridge Group (chain hop 2) via fund SoftBank Vision Fund. Disclosed commitment $45,000M (2018-05-10).
Mubadala Investment Company
Mubadala is associated with United Arab Emirates’s UAE: Stargate UAE / G42 / Core42 / TII Sovereign AI. See actor profile →
Touches Vantage Data Centers (chain hop 1) via fund Digital Bridge Highline Co-Invest Fund. Commitment dollar value not disclosed.
Mubadala Investment Company
Mubadala is associated with United Arab Emirates’s UAE: Stargate UAE / G42 / Core42 / TII Sovereign AI. See actor profile →
Touches Vantage Data Centers (chain hop 1) via fund Digital Bridge Highline Co-Invest Fund. Commitment dollar value not disclosed.
The walk for Vantage Data Centers Port Washington starts at the operator org id (or owner org id when no operator is recorded) and climbs upward through the unified affiliate graph (ownership_chain_edges), normalized child→parent via the ownership_upward_edgesview. At each hop, the highest-authority parent edge wins (priority ordering: SEC EDGAR / 10-K / LEI registry > FactSet Workstation / Revere > Compustat > BIS / Federal Register > PitchBook). Confidence and recency break ties.
The walk terminates on (a) a node with a public-filing-grade ancestor edge — a SEC filer, an LEI-registered listed entity, or a 10-K-disclosed parent — (b) a government entity, (c) a 10-hop limit, or (d) a detected cycle. When termination is not at a public filer or government, the panel labels the chain's end-state as opaque beyond that point. Opacity is reported, never implied.
Per-source confidence (PitchBook): HIGH for Parent / Subsidiary edges; MEDIUM for JV and AFFILIATE edges. Known limitations: (1) shell companies with undisclosed principals terminate the public-record walk; (2) recent transactions reach the panel after PitchBook's weekly refresh; (3) cross-jurisdiction private holding structures may carry intermediate hops that are not in any ingested source. Each row carries an edge-level as of date so freshness is auditable per hop.
Two further caveats are inherent to how the walker and substrate compose. The walker selects a single highest-authority parent per hop, so JV or multi-parent ownership structures collapse to one displayed path; alternate parents exist in the substrate but are not surfaced on this card. And some PitchBook edges encode parent-of relations against entity-resolved stub IDs whose display name reflects a sub-entity (a business unit, an acquired-then-renamed line) rather than the canonical parent — when a chain reads structurally surprising, the per-row source citation is the authoritative reference, not the chain's narrative shape.
Computed at: 2026-04-27. Walk depth observed: 2 hops. Sources combined: Scrutica facility record + PitchBook affiliate graph + SEC CIK cross-reference + LEI registry + (where applicable) FactSet Revere supply-chain graph + Federal Register designation closures.
Vantage Data Center FRA31
Germany