# Tech Data Corp. ## No parent of record among the documented ownership edges; 22 supply-chain edges and no export-control designation reaching it on the record Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing. Cite PrintScreenshot 0 documented hops above it 22 supply-chain edges · 20 upstream, 2 downstream 0 tracked facilities operated 0 export-control designations reaching it 0 sovereign LP commitments reaching it Scrutica id org-tech-data Legal name · 1TECH DATA CORP ### Chain of title Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner. 1. 1. Tech Data Corp. (US) Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges. Chain terminus [Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **Tech Data Corp.**. No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex. ### Suppliers and customers Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline. Upstream Suppliers · 20 - [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet) Licensed supply-chain database - [Amazon.com, Inc.](/companies/org-amazon) Licensed supply-chain database - [Apple](/companies/org-apple) Licensed supply-chain database - [Broadcom Inc.](/companies/org-broadcom) Licensed supply-chain database - [Cisco](/companies/org-cisco) Licensed supply-chain database - [Dell Technologies](/companies/org-dell) Licensed supply-chain database - [Eaton](/companies/org-eaton) Licensed supply-chain database - [Emerson Electric](/companies/org-emerson) Licensed supply-chain database - \+ 12 more Downstream Customers · 2 - [Apple](/companies/org-apple)historical $5.96B/yr — view full provenanceFY2019 - [Cisco](/companies/org-cisco)historical $4.10B/yr — view full provenanceFY2019 [Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-tech-data) ### Follow Tech Data Corp. into the analysis The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Tech Data Corp.'s own numbers into the tool that acts on them. - [Walk Tech Data Corp.'s 22 supply-chain edges in the graph→ 20 upstream · 2 downstream. The interactive graph opens with Tech Data Corp. selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment. ](/supply-chain?org=org-tech-data) - [Tech Data Corp.'s home jurisdiction: the US compute profile→ Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country. ](/country/us) Source coverage Licensed sources do reach Tech Data Corp.: the supply relationships above are drawn from a licensed supply-chain database. What is missing is one specific feed: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which is built from listed-company disclosures; Tech Data Corp. carries no listing or filer identifier, so there is no row for it to load. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).