# NetApp ## No parent of record among the documented ownership edges; 10 supply-chain edges, 5 sovereign LP commitments and no export-control designation reaching it on the record Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing. Cite PrintScreenshot 0 documented hops above it 10 supply-chain edges · 3 upstream, 7 downstream 0 tracked facilities operated 0 export-control designations reaching it 5 sovereign LP commitments reaching it Scrutica id org-netapp SEC CIK 1002047 LEI QTX3D84DZDD5JYOCYH15 ### Chain of title Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner. 1. 1. NetApp (US)CIK 1002047 · LEI QTX3D84DZDD5JYOCYH15 Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges. Chain terminus [Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **NetApp** (CIK 1002047 · LEI QTX3D84DZDD5JYOCYH15). No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex. ### Sovereign LP commitments to funds with documented exposure LP-to-fund commitments from sovereign or state-linked vehicles into funds whose portfolios include this entity. The per-fund commitment amounts and fund identities are drawn from a licensed fund/LP database held under subscription and not redistributed. The sovereign LP attribution and disclosure status are shown; the dollar figures and fund names are withheld. Even where disclosed, a fund commitment is spread across that fund’s whole portfolio, of which this entity is one position among many; presence here is not a claim of control. The [methodology](/methodology#sovereign-lp-attributions) note explains why entity-attributable share is not imputed. Commitments dated 12+ years ago are framed in the past tense: closed-end private-market funds are typically structured on a ~10-year term plus extensions, and the source records the commitment event, not whether a position remains today. 0 of 5 commitments disclose a dollar amount (held under license) Sovereign limited partner Commitments Dated Amount disclosed Past typical fund term Source status GIC Private 4 4 of 4 · 2006 none 4 Current Mubadala Investment Company 1 none recorded none — — Every commitment is _via a private-market fund_; the fund identities and dollar amounts are held under license and never published, so “disclosed” reports that the source records an amount, while the amount itself stays withheld. A commitment past the typical closed-end fund term records the commitment event; it does not establish a current position. Source: Documented ownership record · vintage 2026-04-24 · tier 2 ### Suppliers and customers Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline. Upstream Suppliers · 3 - [Broadcom Inc.](/companies/org-broadcom) r = 0.51 — view full provenance - [Equinix, Inc.](/companies/org-equinix) r = \-0.35 — view full provenance - [Jabil](/companies/org-jabil) r = \-0.16 — view full provenance Downstream Customers · 7 - [Western Digital](/companies/org-western-digital) r = \-0.41 — view full provenance - [Microsoft Corporation](/companies/org-microsoft) r = 0.40 — view full provenance - [Amazon.com, Inc.](/companies/org-amazon) r = 0.18 — view full provenance - [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet) r = \-0.07 — view full provenance - [Cisco](/companies/org-cisco) r = \-0.03 — view full provenance - [NVIDIA](/companies/org-nvidia) Company disclosure (press / IR) - [Sap](/companies/org-sap) Licensed supply-chain database [Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-netapp) ### Follow NetApp into the analysis The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries NetApp's own numbers into the tool that acts on them. - [Walk NetApp's 10 supply-chain edges in the graph→ 3 upstream · 7 downstream. The interactive graph opens with NetApp selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment. ](/supply-chain?org=org-netapp) - [NetApp's home jurisdiction: the US compute profile→ Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country. ](/country/us) Source coverage Licensed sources do reach NetApp: the supply relationships above are drawn from a licensed supply-chain database, and the sovereign-LP commitments from a licensed fund/LP database. What is missing is one specific feed: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which covers a loaded set of listed companies that NetApp is not among; the gap is in coverage, not in the record. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).