<!--
Source: https://scrutica.com/companies/org-motorola-solutions
Generated: 2026-08-24T20:03:46.989Z
Format: Markdown extraction of the rendered HTML at the source URL.
For the full agent guide see: https://scrutica.com/llms-full.txt
For the MCP server see: https://scrutica.com/api/mcp
-->

# Motorola Solutions
## Held through 3 documented hops to Chinese Academy of Sciences; 25 supply-chain edges, 1 sovereign LP commitment and no export-control designation reaching it on the record

Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing.

Cite

PrintScreenshot

3

documented hops above it

25

supply-chain edges · 22 upstream, 3 downstream

0

tracked facilities operated

0

export-control designations reaching it

1

sovereign LP commitments reaching it

Scrutica id

org-motorola-solutions

SEC CIK

68505

LEI

6S552MUG6KGJVEBSEC55

Legal name · 2Motorola (Handset Business) · MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC

### Chain of title

Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner.

1.  1.
    
    Motorola Solutions (US)CIK 68505 · LEI 6S552MUG6KGJVEBSEC55
    
    Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges.
    
2.  2.
    
    [Lenovo Group](/companies/org-lenovo) (HK)LEI 254900VUZRGD5U73RE46
    
    Per [SEC EDGAR](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000128877615000008/goog2014123110-k.htm), as of 2026-01-21 (HIGHtier 2): Lenovo Group is the documented parent.
    
3.  3.
    
    [Legend Holdings Corporation](/companies/org-legend-holdings) (HK)
    
    Per [HKEX / SSE public filing](https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2025/0620/2025062000634.pdf), as-of date not recorded (HIGHtier 1): Legend Holdings Corporation is the documented parent.
    
4.  4.
    
    [Chinese Academy of Sciences](/companies/org-cas) (CN)
    
    Per [HKEX / SSE public filing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legend_Holdings), as of 2026-05-09 (HIGHtier 2): Chinese Academy of Sciences is the documented parent.
    

Chain terminus

[Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **[Chinese Academy of Sciences](/companies/org-cas)**. No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex.

[Coverage indicates an incomplete chain](/methodology#licensed-substrate "Our coverage indicates this chain is incomplete. Ownership records that cannot be republished continue above this entity; this marker says that they exist and nothing about what they contain.")

Every hop above is a record you can read, cited where it stands. Ownership records held under subscription and not republishable carry this entity further than the walk draws it. The marker reports that those records exist; it reports nothing about what they say.

Chain visualization

A visual companion to the walk beside it; the chain-of-title list is the citable artifact.

1.  Motorola Solutions (US)
    
2.  Lenovo Group (HK)
    
    SEC EDGAR · HIGH
    
3.  Legend Holdings Corporation (HK)
    
    HKEX / SSE public filing · HIGH
    
4.  Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
    
    HKEX / SSE public filing · HIGH
    

### Sovereign LP commitments to funds with documented exposure

LP-to-fund commitments from sovereign or state-linked vehicles into funds whose portfolios include this entity. The per-fund commitment amounts and fund identities are drawn from a licensed fund/LP database held under subscription and not redistributed. The sovereign LP attribution and disclosure status are shown; the dollar figures and fund names are withheld. Even where disclosed, a fund commitment is spread across that fund’s whole portfolio, of which this entity is one position among many; presence here is not a claim of control. The [methodology](/methodology#sovereign-lp-attributions) note explains why entity-attributable share is not imputed. Commitments dated 12+ years ago are framed in the past tense: closed-end private-market funds are typically structured on a ~10-year term plus extensions, and the source records the commitment event, not whether a position remains today.

0 of 1 commitments disclose a dollar amount (held under license)

Sovereign limited partner

Commitments

Dated

Amount disclosed

Past typical fund term

Source status

GIC Private

1

1 of 1 · 2005

none

1

Current

Every commitment is _via a private-market fund_; the fund identities and dollar amounts are held under license and never published, so “disclosed” reports that the source records an amount, while the amount itself stays withheld. A commitment past the typical closed-end fund term records the commitment event; it does not establish a current position. Source: Documented ownership record · vintage 2026-04-24 · tier 2

### Suppliers and customers

Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline.

Upstream Suppliers · 22

-   [Oracle Corporation](/companies/org-oracle)
    
    r = \-0.80 — view full provenance
    
-   [Jabil](/companies/org-jabil)
    
    r = 0.74 — view full provenance
    
-   [MediaTek](/companies/org-mediatek)
    
    r = 0.70 — view full provenance
    
-   [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet)
    
    r = \-0.64 — view full provenance
    
-   [Lenovo Group](/companies/org-lenovo)
    
    r = 0.58 — view full provenance
    
-   [Apple](/companies/org-apple)
    
    r = \-0.16 — view full provenance
    
-   [Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.](/companies/org-freescale-semiconductor-inc)historical
    
    $1.30B/yr — view full provenanceFY2002
    
-   [Qualcomm Inc](/companies/org-qualcomm)historical
    
    $624M/yr — view full provenanceFY2005
    
-   \+ 14 more

Downstream Customers · 3

-   [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet)
    
    r = \-0.64 — view full provenance
    
-   [Lenovo Group](/companies/org-lenovo)
    
    r = 0.58 — view full provenance
    
-   [Apple](/companies/org-apple)
    
    r = \-0.16 — view full provenance
    

[Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-motorola-solutions)

### Follow Motorola Solutions into the analysis

The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Motorola Solutions's own numbers into the tool that acts on them.

-   [Walk Motorola Solutions's 25 supply-chain edges in the graph→
    
    22 upstream · 3 downstream. The interactive graph opens with Motorola Solutions selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment.
    
    ](/supply-chain?org=org-motorola-solutions)
-   [Motorola Solutions's home jurisdiction: the US compute profile→
    
    Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country.
    
    ](/country/us)

Source coverage

Licensed sources do reach Motorola Solutions: the supply relationships above are drawn from a licensed supply-chain database, and the sovereign-LP commitments from a licensed fund/LP database. What is missing is one specific feed: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which covers a loaded set of listed companies that Motorola Solutions is not among; the gap is in coverage, not in the record. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).