<!--
Source: https://scrutica.com/companies/org-impinj
Generated: 2026-08-24T20:50:13.752Z
Format: Markdown extraction of the rendered HTML at the source URL.
For the full agent guide see: https://scrutica.com/llms-full.txt
For the MCP server see: https://scrutica.com/api/mcp
-->

# Impinj
## No parent of record among the documented ownership edges; 6 supply-chain edges, 7 sovereign LP commitments and no export-control designation reaching it on the record

Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing.

Cite

PrintScreenshot

0

documented hops above it

6

supply-chain edges · 1 upstream, 5 downstream

0

tracked facilities operated

0

export-control designations reaching it

7

sovereign LP commitments reaching it

Scrutica id

org-impinj

SEC CIK

1114995

LEI

549300M26VGKSMMWWN17

Legal name · 2Impinj · IMPINJ INC

### Chain of title

Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner.

1.  1.
    
    Impinj (US)CIK 1114995 · LEI 549300M26VGKSMMWWN17
    
    Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges.
    

Chain terminus

[Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **Impinj** (CIK 1114995 · LEI 549300M26VGKSMMWWN17). No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex.

### Sovereign LP commitments to funds with documented exposure

LP-to-fund commitments from sovereign or state-linked vehicles into funds whose portfolios include this entity. The per-fund commitment amounts and fund identities are drawn from a licensed fund/LP database held under subscription and not redistributed. The sovereign LP attribution and disclosure status are shown; the dollar figures and fund names are withheld. Even where disclosed, a fund commitment is spread across that fund’s whole portfolio, of which this entity is one position among many; presence here is not a claim of control. The [methodology](/methodology#sovereign-lp-attributions) note explains why entity-attributable share is not imputed. Commitments dated 12+ years ago are framed in the past tense: closed-end private-market funds are typically structured on a ~10-year term plus extensions, and the source records the commitment event, not whether a position remains today.

0 of 7 commitments disclose a dollar amount (held under license)

Sovereign limited partner

Commitments

Dated

Amount disclosed

Past typical fund term

Source status

GIC Private

5

5 of 5 · 2006

none

5

Current

Temasek Holdings

2

none recorded

none

—

Current

Every commitment is _via a private-market fund_; the fund identities and dollar amounts are held under license and never published, so “disclosed” reports that the source records an amount, while the amount itself stays withheld. A commitment past the typical closed-end fund term records the commitment event; it does not establish a current position. Source: Documented ownership record · vintage 2026-04-24 · tier 2

### Suppliers and customers

Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline.

Upstream Suppliers · 1

-   [TSMC](/companies/org-tsmc)
    
    r = \-0.60 — view full provenance
    

Downstream Customers · 5

-   [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet)
    
    r = 0.67 — view full provenance
    
-   [TSMC](/companies/org-tsmc)
    
    r = \-0.60 — view full provenance
    
-   [Cisco](/companies/org-cisco)
    
    r = \-0.52 — view full provenance
    
-   [Intel](/companies/org-intel)
    
    r = \-0.23 — view full provenance
    
-   [Intel](/companies/org-intel)historical
    
    $19K/yr — view full provenanceFY2014
    

[Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-impinj)

### Follow Impinj into the analysis

The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Impinj's own numbers into the tool that acts on them.

-   [Walk Impinj's 6 supply-chain edges in the graph→
    
    1 upstream · 5 downstream. The interactive graph opens with Impinj selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment.
    
    ](/supply-chain?org=org-impinj)
-   [Impinj's home jurisdiction: the US compute profile→
    
    Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country.
    
    ](/country/us)

Source coverage

Licensed sources do reach Impinj: the supply relationships above are drawn from a licensed supply-chain database, and the sovereign-LP commitments from a licensed fund/LP database. What is missing is one specific feed: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which covers a loaded set of listed companies that Impinj is not among; the gap is in coverage, not in the record. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).