<!--
Source: https://scrutica.com/companies/org-hitachi
Generated: 2026-08-24T21:19:45.066Z
Format: Markdown extraction of the rendered HTML at the source URL.
For the full agent guide see: https://scrutica.com/llms-full.txt
For the MCP server see: https://scrutica.com/api/mcp
-->

# Hitachi
## No parent of record among the documented ownership edges; 20 supply-chain edges and no export-control designation reaching it on the record

Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing.

Cite

PrintScreenshot

0

documented hops above it

20

supply-chain edges · 8 upstream, 12 downstream

0

tracked facilities operated

0

export-control designations reaching it

0

sovereign LP commitments reaching it

Scrutica id

org-hitachi

SEC CIK

47710

LEI

549300T6IPOCDWLKC615

Legal name · 1HITACHI LTD

### Chain of title

Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner.

1.  1.
    
    Hitachi (JP)CIK 47710 · LEI 549300T6IPOCDWLKC615
    
    Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges.
    

Chain terminus

[Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **Hitachi** (CIK 47710 · LEI 549300T6IPOCDWLKC615). No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex.

Ownership-change events

Documented M&A-shaped events touching this entity (Buyout, Corporate Divestiture, Asset Sale, Joint Venture, Spin-off). Capital raises without an ownership transfer are excluded, because they do not move the chain.

-   Merger/Acquisition (Corporate Divestiture)
    
    date not recorded · Upcoming· $1,300M
    
    Seller: — licensed fund (name withheld)
    
-   Buyout/LBO (Corporate Divestiture)
    
    2023-08-31 · Completed· size undisclosed
    
    Participant: — licensed fund (name withheld); Seller: Hitachi
    
-   Merger/Acquisition (Corporate Divestiture)
    
    2016-07-29 · Failed/Cancelled· size undisclosed
    
    Acquirer: — licensed fund (name withheld); Seller: — licensed fund (name withheld)
    
-   Merger/Acquisition (Corporate Divestiture)
    
    1989-02-27 · Completed· $398M
    
    Participant: ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP; Participant: — licensed fund (name withheld); Seller: National Semiconductor Corp.
    

### Suppliers and customers

Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline.

Upstream Suppliers · 8

-   [Equinix, Inc.](/companies/org-equinix)
    
    r = \-0.47 — view full provenance
    
-   [AMD](/companies/org-amd)
    
    r = 0.41 — view full provenance
    
-   [Oracle Corporation](/companies/org-oracle)
    
    r = 0.35 — view full provenance
    
-   [Infineon Technologies](/companies/org-infineon)
    
    r = 0.31 — view full provenance
    
-   [Broadcom Inc.](/companies/org-broadcom)
    
    r = 0.29 — view full provenance
    
-   [Datadog, Inc.](/companies/org-datadog)
    
    Licensed supply-chain database
    
-   [Sap](/companies/org-sap)
    
    Licensed supply-chain database
    
-   [Marvell Technology](/companies/org-marvell)historical
    
    $1.5M/yr — view full provenanceFY1999
    

Downstream Customers · 12

-   [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet)
    
    r = 0.60 — view full provenance
    
-   [Equinix, Inc.](/companies/org-equinix)
    
    r = \-0.47 — view full provenance
    
-   [Arista Networks](/companies/org-arista)
    
    r = 0.31 — view full provenance
    
-   [NVIDIA](/companies/org-nvidia)
    
    r = 0.31 — view full provenance
    
-   [Broadcom Inc.](/companies/org-broadcom)
    
    r = 0.29 — view full provenance
    
-   [Amazon.com, Inc.](/companies/org-amazon)
    
    r = 0.29 — view full provenance
    
-   [Microsoft Corporation](/companies/org-microsoft)
    
    r = 0.29 — view full provenance
    
-   [Renesas](/companies/org-renesas)
    
    r = 0.27 — view full provenance
    
-   \+ 4 more

[Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-hitachi)

### Follow Hitachi into the analysis

The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Hitachi's own numbers into the tool that acts on them.

-   [Walk Hitachi's 20 supply-chain edges in the graph→
    
    8 upstream · 12 downstream. The interactive graph opens with Hitachi selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment.
    
    ](/supply-chain?org=org-hitachi)
-   [Hitachi's home jurisdiction: the JP compute profile→
    
    Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country.
    
    ](/country/jp)

Source coverage

Licensed sources do reach Hitachi: the supply relationships above are drawn from a licensed supply-chain database. What is missing is one specific feed: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which covers a loaded set of listed companies that Hitachi is not among; the gap is in coverage, not in the record. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).