# Data I/O ## No parent of record among the documented ownership edges; 10 supply-chain edges and no export-control designation reaching it on the record Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing. Cite PrintScreenshot 0 documented hops above it 10 supply-chain edges · 0 upstream, 10 downstream 0 tracked facilities operated 0 export-control designations reaching it 0 sovereign LP commitments reaching it Scrutica id org-data-i-o SEC CIK 351998 ### Chain of title Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner. 1. 1. Data I/O (US)CIK 351998 Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges. Chain terminus [Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **Data I/O** (CIK 351998). No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex. ### Suppliers and customers Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline. Upstream Suppliers · 0 Downstream Customers · 10 - [Microsoft Corporation](/companies/org-microsoft) r = 0.81 — view full provenance - [Foxconn](/companies/org-foxconn) r = 0.81 — view full provenance - [Samsung](/companies/org-samsung) r = \-0.80 — view full provenance - [Alphabet](/companies/org-alphabet) r = 0.73 — view full provenance - [Amazon.com, Inc.](/companies/org-amazon) r = 0.73 — view full provenance - [Jabil](/companies/org-jabil) r = \-0.64 — view full provenance - [Celestica](/companies/org-celestica) r = 0.60 — view full provenance - [Apple](/companies/org-apple) r = 0.37 — view full provenance - \+ 2 more [Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-data-i-o) ### Follow Data I/O into the analysis The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Data I/O's own numbers into the tool that acts on them. - [Walk Data I/O's 10 supply-chain edges in the graph→ 0 upstream · 10 downstream. The interactive graph opens with Data I/O selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment. ](/supply-chain?org=org-data-i-o) - [Data I/O's home jurisdiction: the US compute profile→ Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country. ](/country/us) Source coverage Licensed sources do reach Data I/O: the supply relationships above are drawn from a licensed supply-chain database. What is missing is one specific feed: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which covers a loaded set of listed companies that Data I/O is not among; the gap is in coverage, not in the record. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).