<!--
Source: https://scrutica.com/companies/org-curtiss-wright
Generated: 2026-08-24T20:53:08.022Z
Format: Markdown extraction of the rendered HTML at the source URL.
For the full agent guide see: https://scrutica.com/llms-full.txt
For the MCP server see: https://scrutica.com/api/mcp
-->

# Curtiss-Wright
## No parent of record among the documented ownership edges; 1 supply-chain edge and no export-control designation reaching it on the record

Everything below is drawn from what the record carries for this organisation: its documented parents, the constraints that reach it, and the relationships and sites recorded against it. Each claim carries its source on the same line, and a blank means the record holds nothing.

Cite

PrintScreenshot

0

documented hops above it

1

supply-chain edges · 0 upstream, 1 downstream

0

tracked facilities operated

0

export-control designations reaching it

0

sovereign LP commitments reaching it

Scrutica id

org-curtiss-wright

SEC CIK

26324

### Chain of title

Each hop carries its data source, source URL (where one exists), as-of date, and confidence label on the same line as the parent name. When two sources name different parents for the same hop, both render as alternates; the walker picks no winner.

1.  1.
    
    Curtiss-Wright (US)CIK 26324
    
    Starting entity. The walker climbs from here through documented parent / subsidiary edges.
    

Chain terminus

[Chain-of-title](/methodology#chain-of-title-walk) terminates at **Curtiss-Wright** (CIK 26324). No further parent is documented. For a public filer that means ultimate beneficial ownership is the dispersed float; for a state-linked entity, that the chain has reached the sovereign apex.

### Suppliers and customers

Dollar flows are annual figures from the fiscal year labelled on the row, drawn from SEC segment and >10%-customer disclosures, re-derived company disclosures, or a licensed supply-chain database; per-row source and authority tier on hover. A row without a year means the source does not state the period. Disclosures older than 5 years are tagged _historical_ and ordered below current rows: they record what was disclosed then, and the counterparty may since have been acquired or dissolved. The 3-month Pearson r comes from a licensed supply-chain database; correlation is a coupling proxy for shared market sensitivity, and it is not a causal channel. Sole-source edges are flagged inline.

Upstream Suppliers · 0

Downstream Customers · 1

-   [NVIDIA](/companies/org-nvidia)
    
    Company disclosure (press / IR)
    

[Explore full supply chain graph →](/supply-chain?org=org-curtiss-wright)

### Follow Curtiss-Wright into the analysis

The records above join to the platform's analytical surfaces. Each link carries Curtiss-Wright's own numbers into the tool that acts on them.

-   [Walk Curtiss-Wright's 1 supply-chain edge in the graph→
    
    0 upstream · 1 downstream. The interactive graph opens with Curtiss-Wright selected, and the cascade simulator propagates seed disruptions across this same edge set, weighted by the curator's substitutability assessment.
    
    ](/supply-chain?org=org-curtiss-wright)
-   [Curtiss-Wright's home jurisdiction: the US compute profile→
    
    Facilities, sovereign-AI programs, export-control posture, and the announced-versus-deployed reality gap for the country.
    
    ](/country/us)

Source coverage

One licensed feed is absent here: the corporate-financials extract behind this profile (geographic revenue, segment mix, capital allocation), which covers a loaded set of listed companies that Curtiss-Wright is not among; the gap is in coverage, not in the record. The public industry classification (SIC, NAICS) is absent as well, and neither absence speaks to what Scrutica holds on Curtiss-Wright elsewhere. Coverage rules in the [methodology](/methodology#licensed-substrate).